There was irrefutable and abundant evidence about the style of government of Fujimori, characteriz by its disrespect for democratic institutions, its proclivity to violate human rights and fundamental freedoms, its patronage use of social programs, and institutionaliz corruption. And as much as Keiko Fujimori tri, she fail in her mission to disassociate herself from that image. That is why many vot against him rather than in favor of Humala. Regarding Ollanta Humala, doubts about how she would behave in an eventual government originat in her past sympathies for Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez; in the insurrectionary acts in which he was involv; in his original government program, crystal clear regarding his goals.
At The Beginning Of Microsoft Announc
To achieve economic growth with social inclusion, which generat many doubts about the means propos to achieve them. As a result of his performance during the campaign, for a large sector of the electorate that perception was changing. Humala made a clear Georgia Email List shift from the extreme left of the political spectrum, which in the opinion of many impli a radicalism that could threaten democratic stability and economic growth, towards the center-left, an ideal space to make important adjustments to economic policy, which would achieve greater social inclusion without putting economic stability at risk or threatening political democracy.
Billion Acquisition Of Gaming Giant Activision
To do this, he present a new government plan drawn up with the active participation of a new team of technicians from liberal or social-democratic backgrounds, who join his candidacy in the ballot stage. This involv a true effort to reach agreement with the sectors of the country that did not agree with his original plan. In this sense, what his detractors present as a defect -changing the government plan- was a virtue, since it express his ability to dialogue and not impose, to give up positions for the sake of consensus, to assume commitments. In short, it was the manifestation of a democratic and non-authoritarian behavior.